Friday, May 18, 2012
Thursday, May 10, 2012
In
android in court,
android vs oracle,
Google,
google android vs oracle,
google vs oracle,
oracle vs android
by Unknown
//
8:24 PM
//
Leave a Comment
Google Android vs Oracle
Google confirmed that it wants a new trial on the copyright portion of a legal battle being fought with Oracle in San Francisco federal court.
Jurors this week ruled that Google's Android operating system for smartphones violated Java software copyrights but deadlocked when it came to the pivotal question of whether it constituted "fair use" that made it acceptable.
Jurors this week ruled that Google's Android operating system for smartphones violated Java software copyrights but deadlocked when it came to the pivotal question of whether it constituted "fair use" that made it acceptable.
If Google's use of copyrighted Java application programming interfaces (APIs) in Android was fair use, Oracle would deserve no damages from the Mountain View, California-based Internet firm under the law.
Google late Tuesday filed a motion asking US District Court Judge William Alsup to declare a mistrial in the copyright phase of the trial and have both questions presented to a new jury in a retrial.
Alsup on Wednesday was presiding over a second phase of the trial devoted to claims by Oracle that Google violated Java patents in Android software.
Adding to the complexity of the case, Alsup has gone on record reserving the right to make the ultimate decision whether APIs can even be copyrighted. The judge told jurors to assume so for the sake of deliberations.
Oracle lawyers are proposing that both sides in the case leave the "fair use" question to Alsup rather than have a new trial.
Oracle's challenge of Google in court over copyrights was an unusual tactic being watched intently in Silicon Valley.
Read More
Special Thanks to IndiaTimes :)
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
In
difference between Windows 8 Vs Ubuntu 12.04,
ubuntu,
ubuntu 12.04,
windows 8,
Windows 8 Vs Ubuntu 12.04,
windows8
by Unknown
//
6:14 AM
//
Leave a Comment
Windows 8 Vs Ubuntu 12.04
2012 has already seen a major update of what’s arguably the most
important Linux desktop: Ubuntu 12.04 and we’re also seeing the most
radical update of Windows with Windows 8 Metro coming since Windows 95
replaced Windows 3.1. So, which will end up the better for its change?
1. Desktop interface
Ubuntu replaced the popular GNOME 2.x interface with Unity when their
developers decided the GNOME 3.x shell wasn’t for them. Some people,
like the developers behind Linux Mint, decided to recreate the GNOME 2.x
desktop with Cinnamon, but Ubuntu took its own path with Unity.
In Unity’s desktop geography, your most used applications are kept in the left Unity Launcher bar on the left.
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Login to Websites Without Passwords using BrowserID
What is BrowserID and how does it work?
BrowserID is an easy way to sign into websites. Instead of
making up a hard-to-remember username and password for each site,
BrowserID lets you use your email address and a single password to sign
in to any site that supports it. This article shows you how BrowserID
works and how you can get started using it.
How does it work?
When you create a BrowserID account, you're sent a verification email
that lets BrowserID know that you really own that email address. Then
when you use BrowserID to log into a website, the website is given your
email address and told that you really do own it but they are never
given your BrowserID password. Basically, BrowserID vouches for you. See
this blog post for all the nerdy details.
What are the benefits of BrowserID?
- You can use one easy-to-remember log in for all sites that support BrowserID.
- You never have to trust a website with your password because they never know it. Also, your password can't be stolen if one of those websites gets hacked.
- BrowserID doesn't track your activity on the websites you visit (privacy policy).
BrowserID Features
Perhaps the best way to begin understanding BrowserID is to walk through
its key design features:
- An email is an identity - There are no usernames in BrowserID, it uses emails addresses instead. Users identify with emails quite naturally, and no new infrastructure is needed to reliably verify ownership of them.
- Decentralized - A user's authentication to a website occurs in relative isolation. No network transactions with third parties are needed, so it is efficient and privacy-protecting. Additionally, any email address may be used, and any email provider may provide first class BrowserID support for their users.
- Ownership-Based Authentication - In BrowserID, the browser manages authentication material which can be used without a password - making authentication with BrowserID more reliant on ownership factors, and less on knowledge factors.
- Usable today, and better tomorrow - An HTML5 implementation provides a functional system today, and BrowserID is designed with adoption by browser vendors in mind. Native support in browsers will afford improvements in both user experience and security.
For More details and login visit : www.browserid.org
Thanks :)